Tag Archives: Mark Levin

Ron Paul Losers

I expect vitriolic comments and the same old tiresome arguments for their dogged determination to champion their candidate who lost.

I like Ron Paul. He has the courage to say what he truly means. That is rare in politics these days. Those who pander to causes and voters have little to brag about except their lack of principles. I agree with Paul about the financial mess we’re in, the gold standard, and auditing the Fed. I do not agree with his foreign policy positions.

We live in a historic time in our country placing us on the threshold of choosing liberty or tyranny. There are no other choices and that is where the staunch Ron Paul supporters lose. We only have two real choices in November to make that choice. I’m in the same position. My candidate didn’t win.

Earlier today I saw the same old tired attitudes and excuses. One commenter on Facebook used Bill Maher, of all people, for his argument not to see “2016: Obama’s America.” He gave Maher’s explanation of why he wouldn’t see it. That’s your frame of reference? Bill Maher? He wouldn’t even avail himself of the long researched information presented chronologically in the movie concerning our present President’s background. Bill Maher was good enough for him. It makes you wonder how radical some Paul supporters have become.

What happened at the “good old boy” GOP convention was an outrage. The rules change and how it was handled was ghastly. Boehner and Sununu have lost all credibility with many Republicans. Mine was gone years ago. Many will leave the party because of it and even more will actively support and work for a NEW political party that upholds our Constitution as written by our Founding Fathers. I advocate a new party AFTER the election. The “chicken-neck” Republicans who have dined at the trough for generations in Washington D.C. must go or be replaced. The GOP will implode when conservatives and libertarians flee the party. Many are dissenting now. Read “Pavlov’s Republicans.”

The dilemma for the Ron Paul supporters is:

1. Do I continue to support Paul in this election knowing I can’t win and let tyranny reign?

2. Do I take my ball and go home, not vote at all, and support tyranny?

3. Do I stamp my feet, vote for Obama and give him power by fiat and support tyranny?

4. Do I use the facade of  “principles” as my excuse not to TRY and save this nation for our children, grandchildren and future generation? Or, at least give them the chance to fight for liberty should I fail at this juncture?

5. Have I REALLY thought about what it means to have Obama for another four years? With Obama’s track record would I even continue to have freedom to speak of Mr. Paul’s point of view?

6. OR, do I take a deep breath, hold my nose, vote for the only other choice, work to get Constitutionalists in the Senate and House, and work like my life depended on it, (if your senior citizen with Medicare it literally does) then hold the new administrations feet to the fire?

An implacable position makes Paul supporters losers. Why you ask? They will lose when they choose to stay at home or write in their candidate’s name making the CHANCE for freedom regained, lost. The man they so admire is an older gentleman. His life span, in all probability, is not much longer; much like mine. Their hero will no longer be with them. The idol they so admire will be gone. Now the rumor is the Paul supporters will try and suppress the vote for Romney. I can think of no better way to leave a legacy of denigration for a fine man than to demolish the chance at saving our children’s future. They will lose on all sides. They will lose him, their freedom and they will help to denigrate Mr. Paul’s legacy.

Yes, I agree with the Ron Paul supporters and Mark Levin that we have lost our freedoms. Will we have a chance, JUST THE CHANCE, to regain them under Barack Obama? The answer is a resounding NO! The recent detainment of a Facebook user, former marine Brandon Raub, without warrant or arrest, taken to a psychiatric facility until the Rutherford Institute stepped in as his legal counsel, is one indication that your freedoms are one electoral vote away from you.

The REAL questions is:

Do I give away the CHANCE to turn it around so I can continue to work for the things Congressman Ron Paul espoused or do I hand it to a despot willing to take even your freedom to voice Mr. Paul’s positions away? That’s the question. A CHANCE to redeem our freedom or NO chance at all and irrecuperable tyranny.

Like Mark Levin said, if the GOP doesn’t listen, we won’t have to do anything; it will implode. Levin’s audio is what changed my mind.

That’s right. Surprise, surprise I held the same position, however, the logic with which Mr. Levin states his position turned me 180 degrees. I beg good citizens who support Ron Paul not to give up the CHANCE.

Mark Levin: I’d Rather Fight With A Moderate Republican Than Give Obama a Second Term!

8 Comments

Filed under Election 2012, Founders, Obama, Republicans

Acceptable Casualties – Thank you Michelle Malkin

Thank you Michelle Malkin!!!

Yesterday Ms Malkin wrote an article titled “The High Priest of Eco-Destruction.” Ken Salazar is just that. As a member of a group that attended the “Save Rural America” event in October, I was VERY pleased to see her mention the fight that Yreka, CA residents where fighting against the Goliath government department that Ken Salazar heads. One small mistake, she said Siskiyou County was in Oregon. It is at the Oregon border but is the further most county of California. That aside she was spot on.

Ms Malkin is the first nationally recognized name that has addressed this subject and the injustice raging in the Klamath River basin. THANK YOU! Fox News wrote the most unbalanced articles on this situation, and no national name, Levin, Hannity, Breitbart, or Beck have addressed it. (See the references below on the Fox News article.)

Secretary Salazar wants to remove four perfectly working hydro-electric dams. WAIT! Aren’t hydro-electric dams considered “green energy?” Isn’t that one of the lowest carbon footprint industries for power? YES, but money and land is to be had through nefarious means and George Soros is waiting with his hand out.

In the world view of our government it believes that the citizens of such actions taken by our regulatory bodies are “acceptable casualities.” Plants, fish, birds, lizards and any other living organism or creature are always placed above the needs, security, health or rights of individual human beings. We are the last on their list to be considered “sustainable” or valuable enough to save. Their actions turn our Constitution upside down. It is ungodly, period. No where in Biblical scripture will you find that man is to serve the earth. The earth serves mankind. Good stewards of the earth yes, but not subservient to it.

When the Condit dam was removed in the state of Washington a few months ago, in the guise to help fish, the greenies shouted in praise to environmental gods. Pictures of the river since that implosion show the devastation, not only to the river but to adjacent private property. Again, “acceptable casualties” for eco-destructionists as Ms Malkin calls them. I call them eco-terrorists and worshippers of a false religion known as Gaia. For those unfamiliar with that term it is earth worship.

Take a look at this photo and tell me, is THIS acceptable to you? If this was your property would you consider devastation acceptable for a fish that may never swim the ruined river again?

Collateral Damage from Condit Dam Removal

Eco-Destruction is right Ms Malkin but its more than that. It is destruction of the human spirit when we can no longer trust our government to protect our homes, lives, safety, and security. Let’s call it what it is EVIL.

For more blogs concerning this subject please see:

The Real McCoys
Fox News Fails Farmers
Soros, Buffett vs Farmers
Sheriff’s Stand Tall for Constitution
Erin Brockovich Revisited?

tphobbitwoman

Leave a comment

Filed under Land Confiscation, Property Rights, Regulations